Sunday, March 29, 2026
Home Blog

Subsidy Gone, Suffering Remains: Nigerians Bear the Real Cost of Fuel Policy – Ndubuisi Anaenugwu

The APC-led government has demonstrated a troubling disregard for its constitutional responsibilities. Chapter II, Section 14(2)(b) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) clearly states that the security and welfare of the Nigerian people shall be the primary purpose of government. Yet, this obligation appears to have been subordinated to a purely capitalist and mercantile approach.

Under President Tinubu, the administration of Nigeria’s crude oil and gas resources has been largely subjected to market forces, with insufficient safeguards to protect the welfare of ordinary Nigerians. This policy direction raises serious concerns about the balance between economic liberalization and social responsibility.

A few days ago, during an interview on Arise TV, David Bird, CEO of the Dangote Refinery, stated that petroleum products from the refinery are sold at prices tied to international crude oil benchmarks. In effect, this means that external shocks—such as supply disruptions from geopolitical tensions, including the ongoing crisis in Iran—will continue to drive up domestic fuel prices.

To better appreciate the implications of this policy stance, it is useful to compare fuel prices and minimum wages across selected oil-producing and developed countries:

Saudi Arabia — $0.60 per litre; minimum wage: $1,000

United States — $0.90 per litre; minimum wage: $1,200

Russia — $0.70 per litre; minimum wage: $300

Canada — $1.20 per litre; minimum wage: $1,800

Iran — $0.02 per litre; minimum wage: $120

Nigeria — $0.98 per litre; minimum wage: $40

From the above, Nigeria’s current fuel price is approximately ₦1,380 per litre, while the minimum wage stands at ₦70,000. Filling the tank of an average vehicle now costs close to an entire monthly wage. By contrast, in Iran, fuel costs about ₦28 per litre, while the minimum wage is significantly higher in local currency terms.

The standard of living in any society is closely tied to energy costs, as fuel directly and indirectly affects transportation, food prices, and household expenses. If the Tinubu administration insists on maintaining international pricing for petroleum products, then it must correspondingly adjust minimum wages—potentially to at least $600 (about ₦840,000 monthly)—while also ensuring reliable electricity, food security, and a functional social safety net. These are the irreducible minimum expectations of citizens in any responsible state.

However, Nigeria’s political leadership appears largely indifferent to the welfare of the people. The fuel price crisis is no longer just an economic issue; it has become a national burden imposed by a system that increasingly appears skewed against the average citizen.

At the heart of this crisis lies a powerful network of vested interests often described as “market cabals.” These are not imaginary actors but influential players embedded within Nigeria’s petroleum supply chain—spanning importation, distribution, and pricing. Their influence is subtle yet far-reaching, and its consequences are felt daily by Nigerians.

Notably, these actors operate across both the public and private sectors.

For decades, Nigeria has failed to maintain functional refineries, engaging in a cycle of neglect and inefficiency. This has entrenched dependence on imported petroleum products and created an environment where a few dominant operators control supply. In such a market, competition is weak, and consumers inevitably bear the cost.
Even with the emergence of the Dangote Refinery, there are claims that entrenched interests have constrained the supply of local crude, forcing reliance on international markets. This raises a troubling question: are these powerful actors stronger than the Presidency, or is there a convergence of interests at the expense of Nigerians?

The removal of fuel subsidy, announced without adequate preparation—particularly the rehabilitation of domestic refineries—has exacerbated the crisis. While some view subsidy removal as a necessary reform, its implementation without structural readiness has imposed severe hardship. Nigeria must prioritize optimizing local crude production for both domestic consumption and export.

Furthermore, the legal and institutional framework governing resource ownership requires urgent review. The concentration of control over mineral resources in the federal government has contributed to longstanding inefficiencies and grievances, forming part of the structural roots of the current crisis.

The consequences are evident: rising transport fares, escalating food prices, and increasing pressure on small businesses struggling with higher operating costs. For ordinary Nigerians, fuel price increases are not abstract policy outcomes—they are daily realities that erode income, dignity, and quality of life.

Nigeria must confront the structural issues sustaining this crisis. Expanding and supporting local refining capacity is no longer optional—it is imperative. Private refinery initiatives must be encouraged within a transparent and competitive framework.

At the same time, regulatory institutions must be strengthened and insulated from undue influence to ensure accountability across the sector.
Transparency must become the norm. Nigerians deserve clarity on how fuel prices are determined and who the key actors are within the industry.
Policymakers must act with urgency and resolve. This includes enforcing effective market regulations, dismantling monopolistic structures, publishing transparent pricing mechanisms, and holding all stakeholders—public and private—accountable without fear or favor. It also requires fast-tracking refinery rehabilitation and ensuring that local production translates into tangible price relief for citizens.

Anything short of decisive action will deepen public distrust and prolong economic hardship. Nigeria cannot afford a petroleum sector that serves a privileged few at the expense of the majority. The responsibility now rests squarely on those in power to break this cycle—firmly, transparently, and without compromise.

Ndubuisi Anaenugwu
Ambassador General, Good Governance Ministry (GGM)
Email: ggovernanceministry@gmail.com

44-year-old Man To Die By Hanging For Killing 74-year-old Mother In Anambra

44-year-old Man To Die By Hanging For Killing 74-year-old Mother In Anambra

One Chidubem Anawonwa, aged about 44, is to die by hanging after an Anambra State High Court sitting at Ogidi in Idemili Judicial Division convicted him of the murder of his 74-year-old mother, Theresa Anawonwa, in Umuokokpa Aborji Village Oba, Idemili South Local Government Area on 23rd April 2019, offence contrary to Section 271 of Criminal Code Cap. 36 Revised Laws of Anambra State, 1991 as amended.

In charge no. HID/7C/2020, the prosecution, led by a Chief State Counsel, Obiageli Nwankiti, and a Principal State Counsel, Uju Igboeli, presented the case, with evidence revealing Chidubem’s long history of violence against his mother, including physical abuse and death threats.

It was gathered that on the said 23rd April 2019 while his young niece was locked in a room at their home, Chidubem, aged 37 then, eventually strangled his mother to death after inflicting multiple bruises on her.

Relying on testimonies of five prosecution witnesses, the court presided over by Justice Lauretta Oyeka, after dismissing ‘defense of alibi’ by the accused, Chidubem, who was represented on pro bono, convicted and sentenced him accordingly.

Naira Holds Steady Against US Dollar, Trades at ₦1,384.17/$

The Nigerian naira maintained its stability against the US dollar on Friday, March 27, 2026, trading at approximately ₦1,384.17 per dollar in the official foreign exchange market. This represents a marginal appreciation of 0.04% from the previous day’s close.

According to data from the Central Bank of Nigeria, the naira has been trading within a narrow range of ₦1,360 to ₦1,380 per dollar in recent weeks, indicating relative short-term stability. However, the parallel market continues to trade at a premium, with rates ranging from ₦1,410 to ₦1,415 per dollar.

The naira’s recent performance is attributed to improved foreign reserves, Central Bank interventions, and global oil price movements. Despite this, demand-side pressures persist, posing a challenge to full exchange rate convergence.

In the parallel market, also known as the black market, the naira traded at a weaker level due to sustained demand for foreign currency. Bureau de change operators in Lagos and Abuja quoted the dollar at around ₦1,400 to ₦1,420, depending on location and transaction volume.

The disparity between the official and parallel market rates underscores ongoing structural issues in Nigeria’s foreign exchange system, including limited dollar supply and sustained demand from importers and individuals.

We Do Not Negotiate: Iran Denies Trump Talks About Negotiations

The United States and Iran are engaged in intense negotiations to end the ongoing conflict, with President Donald Trump claiming that Iran has agreed to abandon its nuclear ambitions.

According to reports, the US has presented a 15-point plan to Iran, which includes demands such as dismantling nuclear facilities, ending uranium enrichment, and limiting ballistic missile programs. In return, the US would lift sanctions and support Iran’s civilian nuclear program.

Trump has expressed optimism about reaching a deal, stating that Iran is “eager to make a deal” and that talks are “productive”. However, Iran has denied negotiating with the US, saying the US is “negotiating with itself”.

The negotiations are being mediated by Pakistan, with Oman also playing a role in facilitating talks. The US has warned Iran that it is prepared to “unleash hell” if no deal is reached.

The conflict has led to significant tensions in the region, with the US deploying troops and military equipment to the Middle East. A deal, if reached, would likely have significant implications for regional stability and global energy markets.

Peter Obi React To the Arrest of Popular Religious Leader After Hosting Him

Troubling Developments in Our Polity that Must Be Nipped in the Bud.

I have just been made aware early this morning that Revered religious leader, Sheikh Ahmad Tijjani Umar has been arrested by authorities shortly after hosting me in Kaduna on Sunday.

This development underscores the deeply troubling state of our nation and our democracy, where freedom of speech and movement is increasingly threatened, and where citizens and perceived political opponents face harassment and unnecessary persecution. This cannot be allowed to continue.

This country must defend freedom and free speech, which are the hallmarks of every democratic society. Suppression and intimidation of dissent can never stand in a democratic society, and this Nigerian government must understand this fact.

I respectfully call on all those bent on undermining our already fragile democracy to please stop and apply the rule of law and tenets of democracy in dealing with citizens.

– PO

Exchange Rate: Dollar to Naira As At Today

The Nigerian Naira has shown signs of appreciation in the parallel market, trading at ₦1,395 per dollar yesterday, up from ₦1,405 per dollar last week. However, the Naira depreciated to ₦1,383 per dollar in the Nigerian Foreign Exchange Market (NFEM). This represents a ₦11 depreciation for the Naira.

The Central Bank of Nigeria’s (CBN) Electronic Foreign Exchange Matching System (EFEMS) has contributed to the relative stability of the Naira, enhancing price discovery and reducing speculative spikes. The reintegration of licensed Bureau De Change operators into the official framework has also increased retail liquidity, diverting small-scale demand away from the unregulated market.

*Market Trends*

– Official Market: The Naira traded at approximately ₦1,356.74 per dollar on March 23, 2026, with intraday highs reaching ₦1,362.
– Parallel Market: The Dollar traded between ₦1,410 and ₦1,430 in Lagos and Abuja.

*Economic Outlook*

Nigeria’s external reserves hover around $50 billion, supported by steady oil production levels of 1.46 million barrels per day and favorable global crude prices. Inflation has eased slightly to 15.10%, and the banking sector has met new capital requirements, reinforcing confidence in the currency’s stability.

El-Rufai to Face Trial Over Corruption Allegations

The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) is set to arraign former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, today, March 24, 2026, at the Federal High Court in Kaduna. El-Rufai is facing charges of conversion and possession of public property, as well as money laundering, alongside Joel Adoga.

A separate charge has also been filed against El-Rufai and Amadu Sule (LEDA) at a Kaduna State High Court, alleging abuse of office, fraud, and intent to commit fraud. The ICPC has stated that El-Rufai has been duly served and is committed to adhering to due process and the rule of law.

The development marks a significant step in the anti-corruption drive, as the ICPC moves to hold high-profile individuals accountable for alleged corruption.

Soludo Shakes Up Anambra Government: Cabinet Dissolved

Anambra State Governor, Chukwuma Soludo, has dissolved his cabinet, just a day after being sworn in for a second term. The move is aimed at reconstituting his executive team for the new term. All political appointees have been directed to hand over their duties to Permanent Secretaries or senior civil servants, effective immediately.

The dissolution was announced through an official circular issued by the Office of the Secretary to the State Government, instructing appointees to complete the handover process by the close of work on March 18, 2026. A meeting has been scheduled for today, March 23, 2026, at 10 a.m. at the ANSEC Chambers, where Soludo will meet with members of the outgoing cabinet.

This development marks a new chapter in Soludo’s administration, as he prepares to unveil his new team. The governor’s inaugural address highlighted key achievements of his first term, particularly in security, declaring an end to the “sit-at-home” era.

bvi channel one

The “No Borrowing” Mantra: Economic Prudence or Policy Misconception? – Anaenugwu Ndubuisi

The “No Borrowing” Mantra: Economic Prudence or Policy Misconception?

Introduction

I write in the public interest, for posterity, and to set the record straight amid growing political rhetoric and economic misconceptions. Too often, the masses are swayed by appealing but simplistic narratives from political leaders. One such narrative is the popular claim by some Governors that “we have not borrowed.” While this may sound fiscally responsible on the surface, it raises an important question: is this truly sound economic policy, or a misunderstanding of development finance?
Recently, during a media chat with the Governor of Anambra State, Dr. Reuben Abati of Arise TV inquired about the level of borrowing undertaken to execute major infrastructural projects, including the construction of a new Government House. The Governor proudly stated that his administration had not borrowed a kobo. This assertion provides a useful backdrop to examine the economic implications of borrowing in public finance.

What Is the Primary Objective of Government?

Chapter II, Section 14(2)(b) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria clearly states that “the security and welfare of the people shall be the primary purpose of government.” This is not optional—it is a constitutional obligation.

To fulfill this mandate, government must ensure that:
1. No citizen goes to bed hungry.
2. The elderly and vulnerable are adequately cared for.
3. Employment opportunities exist for all willing and able individuals.
4. Functional financial systems (banking and insurance) serve public/ private interest efficiently.
5. Reliable and affordable electricity is provided.
6. Access to healthcare is not determined by one’s financial capacity.

These responsibilities require substantial financial resources, which are often beyond what internally generated revenue and monthly allocation from Abuja can provide.

Borrowing as an Instrument of Development

In economics, public borrowing—when properly managed—is not inherently harmful. On the contrary, it is a legitimate fiscal tool for bridging resource gaps and financing long-term capital projects. The key issue is not whether government borrows, but how and why it borrows.A forward-thinking government should:
Invest in productive sectors such as agriculture, housing, infrastructure, and healthcare.Government can stimulate aggregate demand by ensuring income flows to households,
promote inclusive growth and reduce poverty.For instance, if a Government undertakes data-driven planning—identifying population segments such as youths, unemployed persons, retirees, and the working class—it can effectively allocate resources to maximize productivity. When citizens are gainfully employed, crime rates decline, economic activity expands, and overall welfare improves.

The Illusion of “No Borrowing”.

The “no borrowing” mantra, while politically attractive, can be misleading if it results in underinvestment in critical sectors. In a developing economy like Nigeria, where infrastructure deficits are significant, outright avoidance of borrowing may signal missed opportunities rather than fiscal discipline.
It is important to distinguish between:
Productive borrowing (for infrastructure, job creation, and economic expansion), and
Unproductive borrowing (for recurrent expenditure such as salaries or consumption).

The former drives growth and can repay itself over time through increased revenue, while the latter can lead to fiscal distress.

The Reality of Governance and Citizen Expectations.

A troubling reality is that many citizens have normalized government failure. Individuals provide their own water, security, electricity, and even basic infrastructure. This reflects a breakdown in the social contract.

Critical questions must be asked:

i. Does the government actively address unemployment?

b. Is there a clear strategy for improving power supply?

c. Are citizens genuinely benefiting from public resources?

In many cases, the answer is no.

Conclusion

Government must, where necessary, utilize borrowing as a strategic tool to organize the factors of production, stimulate economic activity, and fulfill its constitutional mandate. Avoiding borrowing entirely, especially in a resource-constrained environment, may reflect not prudence but a limited understanding of development economics.

That said, borrowing must be responsible, transparent, and tied strictly to productive investments—not to finance consumption or recurrent expenditure.
Ultimately, good governance is not measured by the absence of debt, but by the presence of development, improved welfare, and a better quality of life for the people.

Anaenugwu Ndubuisi
Ambassador General
Good Governance Ministry (GGM)
Email: ggovernanceministry@gmail.com

CDD Presents Report On 2025 Anambra Gov’ship Election, Says Building, Maintaining Credible Information Ecosystem Essential For Upholding Democratic Principles

CDD Presents Report On 2025 Anambra Gov’ship Election, Says Building, Maintaining Credible Information Ecosystem Essential For Upholding Democratic Principles

Building and maintaining credible information ecosystem before, during and after elections is not just desirable, but essential for upholding democratic principles.

This is contained in the Centre for Democracy and Development (CDD – West Africa) report on the last Anambra Governorship election titled; “Information Disorder and Electoral Integrity: Lessons from the 2025 Anambra Governorship Election”, which was presented in Awka, the state capital, at a one-day regional conference on information narratives for the 2027 general elections in the South-East.

According to the report authored by Chioma Iruke, Valeria Ogide, Ahmad Aluko Raji A. Olatunji and edited by Dr. Dauda Garuba, protecting democratic trust necessitates sustained and collaborative efforts among election management bodies, political actors, social media platforms and civil society organizations.

It note that without a concerted response to misinformation, disinformation and hate speech, the legitimacy of electoral outcomes and public confidence in Nigeria’s democratic institutions will remain at risk, adding that strengthening these efforts is imperative to ensure that electoral processes truly reflect the will of the people and foster a resilient democratic future.

The report maintained that “The 2025 Anambra Governorship election underscores that information disorder has emerged as one of the most profound threats to democratic credibility in Nigeria”, adding that “as electoral processes increasingly rely on digital platforms, the integrity of elections extends beyond administrative competence to encompass the quality, accuracy and trustworthiness of the information environment in which citizens participate”.